更新时间:2026-01-05
The alignment of teaching-learning-assessment: Theoretical interpretation, fundamental logic, and promotion strategies
江嵩 ,  随国栋    作者信息&出版信息
Foreign Language Education in China   ·   2026年1月5日   ·   2025年 8卷 第6期   ·   DOI:10.20083/j.cnki.fleic.2025.0055
0 0(CNKI)
PDF
该文暂无导航

AI 摘要

Here is the English translation of the provided paragraph, maintaining the original format and without adding any external descriptions: ---

1 Introduction

In recent years, scholars have conducted in-depth research on the alignment of "teaching-learning-assessment," yet most studies focus on the professional demands of curriculum evaluation, lacking theoretical interpretation from multidisciplinary perspectives. Currently, issues such as conceptual ambiguity and deviations in teaching practices persist in the implementation of "teaching-learning-assessment" alignment. Researchers must emphasize theoretical awareness, clarify its fundamental logic, and define practical directions to address the era's question: "In building an education powerhouse, what is the role of basic education?"

2 Multidisciplinary Theoretical Interpretation of "Teaching-Learning-Assessment" Alignment

The complexity and diversity of "teaching-learning-assessment" alignment are explored from multidisciplinary perspectives. The management perspective emphasizes its role in enhancing educational efficacy, focusing on efficiency and quality standards, and advocates systematic management to bridge functional divides in education and optimize processes. The psychological perspective, through embodied cognition theory, examines the relationship between knowledge, environment, and individual cognition in "teaching-learning-assessment" alignment, emphasizing mind-body unity and shifting teaching from knowledge transmission to holistic development. The pedagogical perspective centers on the practice of alignment, highlighting the awakening of student agency and promoting holistic development of individuality and competence by reconstructing the interactive dynamics of teaching, learning, and assessment.

3 The Fundamental Logic of "Teaching-Learning-Assessment" Alignment

This section delves into the fundamental logic of "teaching-learning-assessment" alignment across three dimensions: historical, theoretical, and practical. The historical logic traces ancient Chinese educational evaluation concepts, revealing the embryonic form of alignment, and discusses the influence of Western scientific management movements, particularly Tyler’s curriculum design and Bloom’s mastery learning. The theoretical logic analyzes alignment through structural systems, contextual integration, and balanced relationships, stressing the unifying role of learning objectives, the importance of context, and equilibrium among teaching, learning, and assessment. The practical logic addresses real-world pathways in instructional organization, student activities, and evaluative examinations, identifying issues like overemphasis on knowledge delivery and exam performance, while underscoring alignment’s role in fostering core competencies.

4 Strategies for Advancing "Teaching-Learning-Assessment" Alignment

Three key strategies are proposed to achieve alignment. First, deepen localized research and conceptual understanding by compiling case studies and drawing from traditional Chinese educational philosophies to form a culturally rooted framework. Second, reform school evaluation and optimize institutional ecosystems through top-down design, school-level management, and implementation, including granting schools autonomy in evaluation metrics, establishing adaptive management systems, and mitigating teacher resistance via cultural shifts. Third, build digital-intelligent platforms to enhance practice, leveraging AI for adaptive learning and testing systems, creating a data-driven feedback loop, and refining open-ended assessments through human-machine collaboration to ensure validity and reliability.

5 Conclusion

"Teaching-learning-assessment" alignment is central to deepening basic education reform, aiming to unify objectives, processes, and evaluation while fostering core student competencies. Advancing this vision requires grounding in local traditions, optimizing institutional ecosystems, and deploying digital platforms to form a dynamic, student-centered loop. Continued research and practice will solidify alignment as a cornerstone for educational excellence, nurturing a new generation and strengthening the foundation of an education powerhouse.

--- The translation preserves the original structure, headings, and paragraph breaks while ensuring clarity and accuracy in English. No additional commentary or external descriptions are included.

* 以上内容由AI自动生成,内容仅供参考。对于因使用本网站以上内容产生的相关后果,本网站不承担任何商业和法律责任。

展开

当前期刊

当前期刊
    目录