1 Introduction

The importance and urgency of constructing and disseminating the discourse system of Chinese linguistics were discussed. At the beginning of the 20th century, Chinese linguistics shifted from "discourse of interpreting classics" to "discourse of disciplines", opening up modern academic exploration. After the reform and opening up, the influx of Western ideas and academia liberated the thinking of the Chinese academic community, but also led to a decline in academic creativity and originality. China is still on the "periphery" of humanities and academic theory research, and is a "consumer" of Western academic theory research and knowledge products. To reinterpret Chinese linguistics, it is necessary to break away from the modern traditional, universal special binary oppositional thinking and narrative patterns, and explore the content characteristics and development laws of the Chinese linguistic discourse system with a problem oriented approach, seeking space for dialogue with the world's linguistics. Promoting the construction of the Chinese linguistic discourse system is a daunting task that requires further clarification of the generation logic of the Chinese linguistic discourse system, combined with new concepts and methods in the era of digital intelligence, and rethinking the key issues of the Chinese linguistic discourse system.

The Generative Logic of the Discourse System in Chinese Linguistics

Explored the generative logic of the discourse system in Chinese linguistics, emphasizing its dynamic and developmental nature. From the perspective of dialectical materialism, the replacement of old and new discourse within the Chinese linguistic discourse system follows the law of knowledge production evolution, triggered by endogenous needs or external interventions to update the system. Scholars form discourse labels in specific fields and accumulate academic influence through expressing their views, evaluating previous research, scientific arguments, and other means. The overlapping of different individual discourse experiences forms an interconnected network, where dominant discourse merges with weaker discourse to form normative consensus. The subject selection of Chinese linguistic discourse is reflected in the discovery, proposal, research, and evaluation of academic issues, which affects the basic appearance and development direction of the discipline. Since the 20th century, Chinese linguistics has gradually formed an independent knowledge system, reflecting on its habitual acceptance and imitation of Western linguistics, and clarifying its stance and perspective on speech. Academic research is a highly relevant discourse practice that transmits knowledge, expresses ideas, and implements influence through academic publications, forums, education, and other channels, forming intertextual relationships. Vertically, it is reflected as' continuing tradition ', where new and old materials complement each other; Horizontally, it manifests as "integrating new knowledge", deepening dialogue and discourse transformation through interdisciplinary cooperation, cross domain interaction, and cross national research. Academic discourse interaction has the characteristics of "integration" and "repulsion", such as the controversy over the definition of textual nature. The variation and replacement of Chinese linguistic discourse are reflected in the "fine-tuning" of theories, ideas, and concepts in the process of use, and the emergence of new things is the starting point of discourse variation. In the process of borrowing knowledge and materials from Western linguistics, Chinese linguistics innovates and develops through "change", while inheriting traditional theoretical methods and experiential contributions through "unchanged". New discourse undergoes variation and misalignment during the fine-tuning process, such as the deviation of the concept of "meaning" in Chinese characters. The discourse system is a consensus expression gradually formed during the replacement of old and new discourse. The examination of the variability of Chinese linguistic discourse helps to understand the logic of the generation of discourse systems.

Key Issues in the Discourse System of Chinese Linguistics

The core of the Chinese linguistic discourse system lies in the extraction of original concepts and the reconstruction of meaning in the local context, aiming to explore its potential contribution to the world linguistic discourse system. The scientific extraction of discourse elements involves the recognition of rational discourse and the extraction of experiential discourse, where rational discourse can be quickly recognized and analyzed by computers, while experiential discourse requires the integration of individual experience and knowledge reserves. The development of information technology has promoted the digitization and encoding of knowledge, and text mining and ontology construction have become important big data methods for studying discourse systems. The "authentic and clear source" of rational discourse in Chinese linguistics requires computer recognition of core concepts, clear definition of scope and terminology, to ensure the standardization and accurate interpretation of the academic discourse system. The philosophical reflection on the discourse of Chinese linguistic experience emphasizes the influence of different philosophical, cultural, and historical perspectives on problem perspectives and solutions. Chinese linguistic research has formed a problem oriented and realistic concern with local consciousness in a specific historical and cultural context. The contextualization interpretation of Chinese linguistic characteristic discourse aims to break away from the conceptual model and research paradigm summarized by Western experience, and propose a systematic understanding and research plan on language issues based on local experience and knowledge. It will naturally integrate "local meta discourse" with world linguistic discourse, engage in equal dialogue, set agendas, and shape new language perspectives and research interests.

4 Conclusion

The discourse system of Chinese linguistics has universality and particularity, and needs to balance the relationship between generality and particularity to promote innovation. We should avoid self Orientalization and Western centrism, and recognize the limitations of Western concepts. The preliminary exploration focuses on extracting existing discourse, and in the future, attention should be paid to the production of incremental discourse, integrating existing and incremental discourse, and improving the process of generation, search, transformation, utilization, and regeneration. The era of big science is driven by intelligent technology, and a new generation of scholars is crossing disciplinary boundaries and focusing on problems. We need to seek non Western factors in global linguistics, utilize data science and modern rational narrative to enhance the scientific nature of Chinese linguistic research, and propose new possibilities for solving language problems.