1. Research background

Explored the issue of jurisdictional interpretation of multi weighted sentences and pointed out that there is ambiguity and controversy between English and Chinese in the jurisdictional interpretation of multi weighted sentences. English multi quantified sentences often have ambiguity, while Chinese does not have ambiguity. However, there is no consensus in the academic community regarding the interpretation of the scope of passive sentences in Chinese and active sentences in English. The article proposes that the jurisdictional interpretation of multi weighted sentences may be obtained through different quantitative pathways, including [- dependency] interpretation and [+dependency] interpretation. Previous studies have mainly focused on the interpretation of [+dependency], but this article suggests that ambiguity in sentences with multiple weights may be more complex, involving ambiguity between different subclasses of interpretations under [+dependency] interpretation, as well as ambiguity between [+dependency] interpretation and [- dependency] interpretation. The article emphasizes that only by clarifying different quantitative paths can the mechanisms behind the interpretation of multiple quantified sentences in different jurisdictions be revealed, providing a unified logical and semantic analysis basis for the appropriate interpretation of multiple quantified sentences.

2. Interpretation of the Scope of Multi Weighted Sentences from the Perspective of Dependency

Explored the logical dependencies between quantified phrases in multiple quantified sentences, distinguishing between dependency relationships ([+dependency]) and non dependency relationships ([- dependency]). In the [+dependency] relationship, the value of one quantified phrase depends on another, involving relative jurisdiction, resulting in two possibilities of sequential interpretation and reverse interpretation. The [- dependency] relationship means that the quantified phrase values are independent and generate branching interpretations. Multi weighted sentences may exhibit both [+dependency] and [- dependency] relationships, and can be interpreted in three types of contexts: sequential interpretation, reverse interpretation, and branching interpretation.

3. Resolve the academic differences in interpreting the scope of multiple quantified sentences

Explored the issue of jurisdictional interpretation of multi weighted sentences and pointed out that there are differences in the academic community regarding this. Liu (1997) proposed that if two quantified phrases in a multiple quantified sentence are both generalized real referents, the sentence has domain independent interpretation, i.e. [- dependent] interpretation. Hintikka (1974) and Gil (1982) also support this view, stating that the [- dependency] interpretation is the preferred interpretation for sentences with multiple weights. Kennelly (2004) and Jiang (1995) further pointed out that [- dependency] interpretation is the fundamental interpretation, and [+dependency] interpretation requires additional morphological markers or context. Based on these literature, the author believes that the [- dependency] interpretation is the default interpretation of multi weighted sentences, while the [+dependency] interpretation is a non default interpretation. Previous studies have misinterpreted the interpretation of [- dependency] as the [+dependency] interpretation of existential quantifiers taking a broad range, leading to divergent interpretations of the scope of some multi weighted sentences. The author proposes a consistent analytical framework for interpreting the scope of multiple quantified sentences by analyzing active sentences in both English and Chinese: English ∀ - ∃ active sentences and ∃ - ∀ active sentences both have [- dependency] interpretation, as well as sequential and reverse interpretation in [+dependency] interpretation; Both Chinese ∀ - ∃ active sentences and ∃ - ∀ active sentences have sequential interpretation in both [- dependency] interpretation and [+dependency] interpretation. This confirms that the jurisdictional interpretation of multi weighted sentences is composed of a combination of [- dependency] interpretation and [+dependency] interpretation.

4. Scope interpretation of multi weighted sentences in English and Chinese

Explored the issue of jurisdictional interpretation of multi weighted sentences in English and Chinese, and pointed out that there are inconsistent judgments in the jurisdictional interpretation of Chinese multi weighted sentences in existing research. The article analyzes passive sentences, "ba" sentences, and object complement structures in Chinese and finds that these multiple quantified sentences all have [- dependency] interpretation and sequential or reverse interpretation, but there is no reverse or sequential interpretation. The article also provides a unified analysis of the jurisdictional interpretation of English double object sentences, accusative sentences, and NP-PP sentences, and argues that these multiple quantified sentences all have [- dependency] interpretation as well as sequential and reverse interpretation in [+dependency] interpretation. In addition, the article also mentioned that in Bengali, the heavy sentences are only interpreted as [- dependent], without [+dependent] interpretation. These analyses validate the viewpoint that '[- dependency] interpretation is the default interpretation' and provide a new perspective for resolving the jurisdictional interpretation differences of multi weighted sentences in English and Chinese.

5. Conclusion

Guided by the "New Depictionism", this paper conducts an in-depth analysis of the generation path of multiple quantitative sentence domain interpretation, revealing the two paths of [- dependency] and [+dependency] and their impact on the interpretation of multiple quantitative sentence domains. The article provides a unified analysis of different types of multi weighted sentences and points out that existing research on the interpretation of jurisdictional ambiguity belongs to the category of [+dependency] interpretation. The article emphasizes that distinguishing between the interpretation of [+dependency] and [- dependency] is crucial for understanding the true nature of the interpretation of multiple quantified sentence domains. The article also suggests that the ambiguity in the interpretation of multi weighted sentences may stem from the combination of [+dependency] and [- dependency] interpretations, while some seemingly unambiguous sentences may have both logically equivalent [+dependency] and [- dependency] interpretations. The article argues that the [- dependency] interpretation is the default interpretation of multi weighted sentences, while the [+dependency] interpretation is a non default interpretation. At the end of the article, it is pointed out that multiple quantified sentences in different languages and structures all have [- dependency] interpretations, which may reflect the underlying cognitive mechanisms and operational logic of human minds in quantitatively interpreting.