1、 Introduction

Explored the relationship between question elements and verb sentence constructions, and pointed out that there are differences in the expression and mechanism of question elements among verb sentences of different constructions. Academic research mainly analyzes the relationship between constructions and question elements from three aspects: function, structure, and semantics. Functionally, study the interaction between the function of question elements and the operation of structural functions; Structurally, analyze the correspondence between verb question element structure and proposition structure; Semantically, explore the functional role of verb element noun semantic categories in structural semantic suppression. However, research on the relationship and functional attributes of question elements in different types of verb proposition constructions is relatively limited. This article will draw on relevant theories to study the functional semantic mechanism and syntactic semantic expression of verb elements in passive constructions of Russian and Chinese. There are semantic differences between Russian and Chinese passive constructions, but there are common features in the expression of verb predicate elements. The article will examine the question element performance of passive constructions in Russian and Chinese from the aspects of question element coordination, coincidence, object question element "subjectivity", and subject question element invisibility, revealing their similarities and common characteristics. This will provide a new perspective for the study of verb question element theory and related construction semantic phenomena, promoting a deeper understanding of verb related construction grammar and sentence semantic issues.

2、 The verb element relationship in passive constructions of Russian and Chinese

Explored the relationship between verb elements in passive constructions of Russian and Chinese, and pointed out that verb elements are closely related to syntactic position and syntactic behavior. The Russian passive construction emphasizes the semantic and logical relationship between the object and the behavior, placing the subject at the beginning of the sentence through the grammatical property of "anti causative". The passive construction in Chinese emphasizes the passive characteristics of the object, and its verb element relationship and functional expression are determined by the lexical semantic conceptual structure relationship. There are similarities and differences between the passive constructions of two languages in terms of the semantic function of the question element role, communicative pragmatic performance, and formal characteristics. The article will explore the common characteristics of verb question element relationships in passive constructions of Russian and Chinese, starting from the role function relationship and form semantic expression of question elements. These common characteristics are determined by the objective conceptual content and action object semantic logical thinking contained in passive constructions.

3、 The performance of passive construction verb question elements in Russian and Chinese

In depth exploration was conducted on the performance commonalities of verb elements in passive constructions of Russian and Chinese, mainly reflected in four aspects: the essential characteristics of element coordination, the functional characteristics of element coincidence, the "subjectivity" of object elements, and the invisibility of subject elements. These characteristics together constitute the inherent logical relationship between verb question elements and passive constructions.

4、 Conclusion

Verb question elements are similar in passive constructions in Russian and Chinese, and are closely related to the meaning of the construction. The common characteristics of cognitive thinking between the Russian and Chinese ethnic groups have led to a convergence of the two languages in terms of question element coordination, overlapping functionality, object question element "subjectivity", and subject question element invisibility. The coordination of question elements is substantive and constructive, the coincidence of question elements is functional and interpretive, the subjectivity of object question elements is structural semantic operability, and the implicitness of subject question elements is communicative pragmatic selectivity. In passive constructions of Russian and Chinese, there exists a mutual suppression between constructions and question element parameters. These analyses reveal the similar question element performance of passive constructions in Russian and Chinese in terms of verb event question element relationships, semantic role identification of question element parameters, hierarchical division, and functional operation. They reflect the characteristics of verb question element performance and the impact of language performance on passive construction semantics, as well as its value for sentence interpretation.