The multiple incidents of online violence in 2022 have highlighted the seriousness of online violence, especially the phenomenon of "online course explosion" that damages the educational environment and traditional values. The survey found that post-2000s teenagers are the main participants, who, for entertainment or profit motives, collaborate with students in need and disrupt online classrooms. The Outline of Rule of Law Education for Youth emphasizes that high school education should enhance practicality, participation, and critical thinking, cultivate rational expression and awareness of protecting rights in accordance with the law. However, teenagers' self-awareness and ignorance of the law lead to their rebellious behavior on the internet, such as using the internet as a tool for emotional release. Despite administrative penalties, rebellious mentality has led some minors to disregard the rules. The online violence behavior of teenagers has a negative impact on society and others, sparking discussions on whether responsibility should be pursued. On the one hand, some scholars advocate for criminal prosecution based on the principle of proportionality between criminal responsibility and punishment; On the other hand, some argue that education is more effective than punishment. The article suggests that effective prevention and control of online violence against minors can be achieved through reasonable legal barriers and strengthened education.
Explored the motivations behind the explosive behavior of teenagers participating in online courses. Firstly, it should be pointed out that online violence is the result of online misconduct and abuse of freedom of speech rights. The immaturity of teenagers in terms of mind, behavior, and cognition makes them vulnerable to the influence of big data push and the gray industry of online violence. Secondly, it analyzed the excessive self promotion of teenagers during the transition period and how they use online violence to resist home school management and teacher discipline. Finally, the malicious expression of online course explosion behavior was discussed, which not only damages the authority and dignity of teachers, but also disrupts classroom order and has a psychological impact on other students. The article emphasizes that schools, families, and society should strengthen the guidance of values for young people, and that young people themselves should enhance their moral and legal literacy to maintain order on campus and in the classroom.
Explored the punishability of the behavior of "online course explosion", pointing out its anonymity and specificity, which may constitute a new type of online violence. Compared with traditional online violence, the impact of online course explosion is relatively small, but the information dissemination is strong, and the harm may rapidly expand. The article analyzes the possibility of online course explosion being punished, and believes that the crimes of insult, defamation, and provocation in the current criminal law may be applicable. At the same time, the boundary between freedom of speech and excessive expression was discussed, emphasizing that criminal law regulation should comply with the principle of proportionality and legitimacy to reasonably constrain the power of punishment. Through the constitutional review framework, the criminalization of online course blasting has legitimacy in terms of purpose, means, necessity, and reasonableness, aiming to maintain the dignity of victims and the online environment, while balancing freedom of speech and social governance needs.
Emphasis was placed on the importance of clarifying the responsibilities of all parties in network governance, and a theory of distinguishing between personality legal interests and property legal interests was proposed. Damage to personal legal interests, such as reputation and mental damage, should be taken seriously and considered as substantial harm, rather than just incidental damage. If the legal interests of property are damaged, compensation should be made through civil law remedies. At the same time, the chapter discusses the responsibility of network operators in online violence incidents, including prevention and intervention measures, as well as the correction of online course explosion behavior among teenagers. Network operators should use technological means to promptly detect and intervene in online bullying incidents, establish protection mechanisms, limit the spread of harmful information, and assume corresponding responsibilities when they fail to perform their duties effectively. For teenagers, timely correction and correction are needed to accurately manage online violence.
The online course explosion is a form of online violence, and its ineffective relief is mainly due to the difficulty in providing relief to victims and the low cost of violating the law for perpetrators. The reasons for the difficulty in providing relief to victims include group characteristics, long litigation cycles, and low investment return ratios. The practical basis for the low cost of perpetrators' illegal activities includes the high threshold for criminalizing online violence, the underestimation of the substantive damage caused by online violence by traditional criminal law scholars, and the inaction of victims and platforms. The Outline of Youth Rule of Law Education emphasizes the importance of strengthening youth rule of law education. In the face of relief failures, reasonable attribution and clear division of labor should be made, and negative evaluations should be embedded in the right and wrong views of youth to prevent online violence.
* 以上内容由AI自动生成,内容仅供参考。对于因使用本网站以上内容产生的相关后果,本网站不承担任何商业和法律责任。