1、 The historical structural characteristics and research status of Armenian duk '

In depth exploration of the historical structural characteristics of the personal pronoun duk 'in Armenian language and its usage in modern and ancient Armenian languages. In modern Armenian, duk 'is considered an independent word that shares a stem with the singular form du, but - k' is not an independent affix. In ancient Armenian, - k 'was widely used as a plural affix, allowing duk' to be analyzed as two parts, du and - k ', forming a simple plural form similar to nouns. The phenomenon of using singular stems and plural affixes to form the plural form of personal pronouns has appeared in many languages around the world, such as Sino Tibetan, South Asian, Afro Asian, Austronesian, Altaic, and Basque.

2、 The morphological and semantic characteristics of first and second person plural pronouns in Indo European languages

Deeply explored the morphological and semantic characteristics of first and second person plural pronouns in the Indo European language family. The personal pronouns of the Indo European language family exhibit a clear "decorrelation" in both singular and plural forms, meaning that the plural form is not simply formed by adding a suffix to the singular form. This phenomenon of divergent stems is manifested morphologically as completely different stems, while semantically it involves deeper grammatical and philosophical issues.

3、 Comparison of Second Person Monoplural Analogy Phenomena among Ancient Icelandic, Modern Greek, and Armenian

Explored in depth the phenomenon of analogy in second person singular and plural forms in ancient Icelandic, modern Greek, and Armenian languages. In the evolution of personal pronouns in the ancient Ice Island language, the second person plural form é r and the even form it formed a new form different from the singular form by adding the ∧ sound, while other case positions remained unchanged. This change may be influenced by the singular form 동ú rather than simple phonetic changes. Modern Faroese, Luxembourgish, and Swiss German also exhibit similar analogies, but their historical background and phonetic changes are different from ancient Icelandic.

4、 An analysis of the reasons for the analogy between singular and plural forms of Armenian personal pronouns

The analogy of singular and plural forms of personal pronouns in Armenian language is accidental, and compared with other Indo European languages, the analogy phenomenon in ancient Armenian language is more unique. The analogy between singular and plural pronouns in ancient Armenian language requires two conditions: the same stem vowel and a clear plural form suffix. This analogy phenomenon only exists in the second person and does not involve the first person. It may be related to different ethnic views on the relationship between "I", "you", "us", and "you". The analogy of ancient Armenian reflects a shift in thinking patterns, and modern Armenian inherits this form. In the Indo European language family, the first and second person singular and plural forms are often divergent, while the third person singular and plural forms have some connection in many languages. This phenomenon may be related to the unique understanding of "I" and "you" by ancient Indo European people.

5、 Conclusion

The analogy of the form and meaning of the Armenian personal pronoun duk 'is the result of the combined effects of form similarity and semantic commonality. In ancient Armenian, the second person singular du and plural * juk 'are derived from the common stem vowel u and the plural suffix - k', forming a unique singular and plural form. The plural form is composed of the singular form and the suffix, similar to ordinary nouns. The semantic connection between singular and plural forms also plays a key role in analogy, and duk 'is the manifestation of semantic analogy between singular and plural forms.