1. Introduction

The study of concept transfer has expanded from concept category transfer to conceptualization transfer, forming a new branch. The existing research methodology framework fails to highlight the characteristics of conceptual transfer, and empirical research often relies on linguistic evidence, which can easily mistake language transfer for conceptual transfer. This article proposes a framework for bidirectional conceptual transfer judgment based on cognitive comparative analysis, and designs experimental tasks with the aim of providing empirical evidence for conceptual transfer research.

2. Research background

The study of conceptual transfer draws on the methodology of traditional language transfer, but needs to consider both the language and conceptual levels. The concept transfer judgment method framework proposed by scholars such as Jarvis and Cai Jinting emphasizes the importance of both verbal and nonverbal evidence. The main difference between conceptual transfer and conceptual category transfer lies in the source of transfer. The former originates from cross linguistic differences in conceptualization methods, while the latter originates from cross linguistic differences in conceptual categories. Empirical research mainly focuses on the domain of motion, but mostly focuses on the linguistic level and lacks examination of the conceptual level. The existing research methods have shortcomings, such as focusing on the language level, lacking conceptual consensus, and mainly focusing on positive transfer. Cognitive comparative analysis provides a new approach, emphasizing the comparison of conceptual systems at the conceptual level, which helps to change the current situation of emphasizing language over conceptual level. Eye tracking technology has potential in conceptual transfer research, but further optimization of experimental design is needed.

3. Framework for determining bidirectional conceptual transfer

A bidirectional conceptual transfer judgment method framework based on cognitive contrastive analysis has been proposed, aiming to simultaneously examine the consistency between concepts and language levels. The framework consists of four steps: firstly, comparing the differences between the native language and the target language to determine the prerequisites for transfer; Secondly, compare the differences between learners and native speakers to determine the occurrence of transfer; Then verify the consistency of the learner's first and second language features to ensure that the differences stem from language influence; Finally, examine the consistency between learners' conceptualization and language use to avoid over explanation. This framework emphasizes the collection of empirical data at the conceptual and linguistic levels to improve the operability of research, in order to change the current situation of insufficient examination of conceptual levels and inadequate transfer judgments in research.

4. Empirical study on bidirectional conceptual transfer

Through empirical research, this study explores whether Chinese English learners undergo bidirectional conceptualization transfer when dealing with sports events. The research design combines eye tracking technology and language description tasks, aiming to simultaneously examine the transfer at both conceptual and linguistic levels. The research subjects include Chinese learners with different levels of English proficiency and native English Chinese speakers. The experimental material consists of 48 animated short videos, involving different elements of motion events. Data collection includes eye movement data and language expression data, with analysis indicators covering fixation frequency, fixation duration, and lexical and syntactic features of language expression.

5. Conclusion

A bidirectional conceptual transfer judgment method framework based on cognitive comparative analysis has been proposed, emphasizing consistency analysis at the conceptual and linguistic levels. Empirical research has verified the feasibility of the framework, and it is recommended to expand the conceptual domain and strengthen conceptual level analysis in future research.