say a few words about

Explored the skepticism hermeneutics proposed by Lico, which complements the belief hermeneutics and represents both retrospective and prospective interpretive paths. Doubtful hermeneutics focuses on the examination of conscious representations and has profoundly influenced multiple disciplinary fields. The hermeneutics of faith emphasizes that trust tested by doubt is the guarantee for the restoration of meaning. Gadamer believed that all hermeneutics is about overcoming doubt. Sedgwick pointed out that skeptical hermeneutics has evolved into paranoid reading, while Philsky proposed post critical reading, viewing the text as a friend to be understood rather than an enemy to be conquered, emphasizing the emotional suppression of critical reading and the emotional sharing of skeptical hermeneutics.

review

Doubtful hermeneutics originated from Liko's 1952 work, and through the critical practices of Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud, formed a hermeneutic strategy that reveals social and self-awareness illusions. Foucault believed that these three thinkers changed the nature of symbols, making hermeneutics responsible for continuous self interpretation. Liko's concept of skeptical hermeneutics was not yet mature in Freud and Philosophy: On Interpretation, but was further elaborated by Freud in The Conflict of Interpretations. Liko positioned skepticism hermeneutics as a transitional stage from phenomenology to hermeneutics, emphasizing the importance of Kant and Nietzsche establishing a connection between skepticism and interpretation. In 1971, Liko first explicitly proposed the concept of skeptical hermeneutics, emphasizing its importance in internal criticism. Philsky applied skeptical hermeneutics to literary criticism and explored the issue of "resistant readers", arguing that skeptical reading may lead to reading activities becoming monologues, ignoring the complexity of the text. She advocates restructuring feminism into a reading mode that expands rather than limits aesthetic experience. Philsky and Liko have differences in the application of skepticism hermeneutics, but both emphasize the difference between skepticism and skepticism, as well as the crucial role of faith in maintaining a balance between skepticism creativity and destructiveness. Liko proposed the concept of "post critical faith", emphasizing the search for restorative positions in doubt, while Philsky focused on trust in the text. Doubtful hermeneutics provides a new method of exploration in the interpretation of literary and cultural texts, while relying on the practices it questions.

Paranoid reading and restorative reading

In depth exploration of Sedgwick's critique of skeptical hermeneutics and advocacy of reparative reading. In his 2003 article, Sedgwick proposed that Tomkins' "affective system" should replace Freud's "drive", and pointed out that "paranoid reading" has predictability, reflexivity, imitation, and negativity, pursuing synonymous repetition and opposing pleasure and knowledge. She drew inspiration from Klein's theory and proposed restorative reading, emphasizing the reconstruction of sustainable living after trauma and placing negative emotions in the context of 'queer temporality'. Sedgwick believes that restorative reading can provide readers with space to realize that the future may be different from the present, and to accept profound pain and comfort. Her "repair turn" may originate from the reflection on AIDS in the 1980s and early 1990s, as well as the hope brought by cocktail therapy and Buddhist books. Professor Hansen believes that Sedgwick has been working in a reparative mode. Best pointed out that Philsky inherited this ideal, and the critical mindset of worry and doubt hindered his ability to accept and be generous. Both Sedgwick and Philsky believe that social violence has become visible, and critical theory should go beyond the pathological characterization of drive and desire, focusing on the rhetorical genre of paranoid reading.

Critical reading and skeptical reading

Philsky proposed four main themes about critical reading and skeptical reading: the combination of criticism and reason in early modern Europe, the criticism of language by Nietzsche and Frankfurt School, the critical reading habits of literary critics and writers in the late 19th century, and skepticism as a weapon for the weak. She advocates rephrasing critical reading as a literary version of skeptical hermeneutics to reveal the essence and limitations of critical reading. Critical theory holds that the surface meaning of a text conceals the true agenda and requires critics to uncover and decode it. Philsky also pointed out that skepticism plays an important role in maintaining social order and modern surveillance structures.

conclusion

Explored the connection between skeptical hermeneutics and deep exploration and alienation of emotions in the Indo European language family, as well as its intersection with Freud, Marx, Nietzsche, and post structuralism. Philsky proposed that skepticism is a non emotional emotion that overlaps with the detached stance of experts. Scholars are wary of the either or logic, and Sedgwick advocates limiting the paranoid energy of doubt and preserving the weak theoretical space in literary criticism. Philsky encourages critical reflection on one's own path dependence, moving towards a broader emotional style and mode of argumentation. Grandin believed that belief hermeneutics could collaborate with skepticism hermeneutics. Philsky proposed post critical reading or reflective reading, which brings curiosity and aesthetic energy back to literary research. She calls for a combination of spontaneous skepticism and enthusiastic listening, combining analysis with emotion, criticism with love. Doubtful hermeneutics may fill the gap in emotional research among academic practitioners and continue its vitality.