Deeply explored the connection between surrealism and dreams, unconsciousness, and Jungian archetype theory, and criticized the viewpoint of simplifying surrealism into literary and visual annotations of psychoanalytic theory. The article points out that the relationship between surrealist works and dreams is analogical rather than equivalent, and its core lies in breaking the rules of daily logic and the experiential world, while retaining the broken and recombined things, making the humanized content of the object closer to its form. Surrealism challenges the foundation of art itself, allowing the subject to play a more open and free role in the work, achieving self dissolution. The article also discusses the relationship between surrealism and concepts such as psychoanalysis, montage techniques, childhood experiences, modernity paradox, and objectivism, emphasizing that the dialectical imagery of surrealism reveals the dialectical nature of subjective freedom in an objective state of non freedom. Finally, the article points out that surrealism has become outdated because modern people no longer allow themselves to be aware of the experiences they have been deprived of, which are precisely captured by the negation of surrealism.